(Total Views: 95)
Posted On: 09/22/2018 2:23:44 PM
Post# of 65629
Trump's public statements denying Russian interference in our elections, including what he said in Helsinki, are evidence enough of his subservience to Putin....for reasonable people.
There was a video of that disgraceful moment
THIS is what 'dragged kicking and screaming' looks like:
There was a video of that disgraceful moment
THIS is what 'dragged kicking and screaming' looks like:
Quote:
Trump refuses to impose new Russia
sanctions despite law passed by US Congress over election hacking
'It just doesn’t make sense'
Tom Embury-Dennis |
@tomemburyd |
Tuesday 30 January 2018 13:57
The Trump administration has announced it will not impose additional sanctions on Russia, despite Congress passing a law allowing the President to do so.
With Monday the deadline for the White House to impose any new measures, the US State Department insisted the threat of sanctions was already acting as a deterrent.
But State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert insisted Russia’s defence industry was already suffering, with foreign countries abandoning purchases worth “several billion dollars” from the Kremlin.
Congress voted almost unanimously to pass a bill last year that punished Russia for its alleged meddling in the 2016 US election and aggression in east Ukraine.
Mr Trump, who wanted warmer ties with Moscow and had opposed the legislation as it worked its way through Congress, signed it reluctantly in August, branding the bill “seriously flawed”.
The new sanctions would have required the US Treasury Department to penalise foreign governments and companies doing business with Russia’s defence and intelligence sectors.
EU says it will 'react swiftly and appropriately' after Donald Trump trade war threat
But citing long timeframes associated with major defence deals, Ms Nauert said it was better to wait to impose those sanctions.
“From that perspective, if the law is working, sanctions on specific entities or individuals will not need to be imposed because the legislation is, in fact, serving as a deterrent,” she said in a statement.
The bill allowed sanctions to be delayed or waived, but any inaction would have to come with evidence to Congress that Russia was making progress in cutting back on cyber meddling.
The measure, known as the “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA)”, also required the administration to list “oligarchs” close to Russia president Vladimir Putin’s government and issue a report detailing possible consequences of penalising Russia’s sovereign debt.
Monday’s deadline to release those reports was seen as a test of Trump’s willingness to clamp down on Russia. Critics condemned him for failing to announce any sanctions.
Evan McMullin, who ran for the presidency as an independent candidate in 2016, said Mr Trump's "refusal" to implement new sanctions was "the most important news of the night" on Monday.
He suggested a vote in Congress to release a controversial secret memo that alleges misconduct by the FBI during the election was just a “scheme” to “distract” voters.
Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, said: “The State Department claims that the mere threat of sanctions will deter Russia’s aggressive behaviour. How do you deter an attack that happened two years ago, and another that’s already underway? It just doesn’t make sense.”
“I’m fed up waiting for this administration to protect our country and our elections,” he said in a statement.
Members of Congress, including Democrats and some of Trump’s fellow Republicans, have been clamouring for his administration to use sanctions to punish Moscow for past election interference and prevent future meddling in US polls.
Shortly before midnight on Monday, the Treasury Department released an unclassified “oligarchs” list, including 114 senior Russian political figures and 96 business people.
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼