(Total Views: 253)
Posted On: 09/20/2018 8:10:50 AM
Post# of 40991
Yes, ulmadi, the bashers all/most seemed to be shareholders during last year's Aug/Sep PPS run up. Many, many of their posts have been reposted or responded to and their posts showed how positive they were about ONCI.
Despite their self anointed prowess as flippers extraordinaire who were banking impressive profits, many were caught holding positions with a high avg PPS when ONCI PPS went into decline.
By their own admissions, they were "in the red" and it had to be someone else's fault - Steve or Mary or Katano or anyone but themselves.
Of course, this is all dependent on them posting the truth about their buys/sells which is very suspect. Please note that BB was boasting about a flip the other day of 4.2M shares at $.0024 when it was proven that the total shares traded at that PPS was less than BB claimed to have sold himself.
BTL posted about buying "millions of shares" at $.0058 & $.0063 and turned a profit even though ONCI PPS has not been that high since his supposed buys.
I guess the point I'm trying to make is their bashing of Steve is/was driven by their own trading shortcomings, but, they lie so much that it is difficult to believe anything they post. Best to ignore them altogether.
Despite their self anointed prowess as flippers extraordinaire who were banking impressive profits, many were caught holding positions with a high avg PPS when ONCI PPS went into decline.
By their own admissions, they were "in the red" and it had to be someone else's fault - Steve or Mary or Katano or anyone but themselves.
Of course, this is all dependent on them posting the truth about their buys/sells which is very suspect. Please note that BB was boasting about a flip the other day of 4.2M shares at $.0024 when it was proven that the total shares traded at that PPS was less than BB claimed to have sold himself.
BTL posted about buying "millions of shares" at $.0058 & $.0063 and turned a profit even though ONCI PPS has not been that high since his supposed buys.
I guess the point I'm trying to make is their bashing of Steve is/was driven by their own trading shortcomings, but, they lie so much that it is difficult to believe anything they post. Best to ignore them altogether.
(1)
(0)
