for over a year naysayers have intimated that nnlx doesnt have the funds to follow thru on a website revision-we've been through this before

others have pointed out the likely connection between grants and the pretest study being formulated

a recent update said funding of such was from grants and investment-the former likely cant directly fund website revision but can free funds elsewhere to do so

none of this was done in a cave -we've all seen the increased stock activity and pps rise

so there is plenty of context -which i and others have posted about -to suggest what i said-have u not read e.g my posts re these things even though you have been giving me a thumbs down for many of my posts

why did i bother to detail as many as a dozen reasons why individual posts of yours were deleted and spend many scores of pages detailing over and over the purposes and rules which were continually ignored -bashers cant say they were not amply warned- i've never seen any other mod do that
i think i was more than fair in spending 1000's of hours dealing w bashers here without pay and seldom w thanks