(Total Views: 79)
Posted On: 08/30/2018 12:07:27 PM
Post# of 65629
Try, please try, to use some common sense and evidentiary standards.
1. Mueller has shared NOTHING RE his investigation, save for the indictments THUS far.
So no conclusion RE Russian collusion is warranted, either way.
What we do know is that 25 Russians have been indicted, so far, and that the likelihood that those indictments do not contain electronic intercepts of Russians communicating with Americans are slim and none, and we both know who just left town.
2. Comey is long gone and would be the first to say that he has no idea what Muller has uncovered since his firing.
Remember "what we do know", above, when Mueller presents either his next indictments and or his report on the investigation.
It will, I predict, be the linchpin for the same conspiracy charges against Americans that have been leveled against the Russians.
'Conspiracy' is the LEGAL term, the chargeable offense, for 'collusion'.
Book it.
1. Mueller has shared NOTHING RE his investigation, save for the indictments THUS far.
So no conclusion RE Russian collusion is warranted, either way.
What we do know is that 25 Russians have been indicted, so far, and that the likelihood that those indictments do not contain electronic intercepts of Russians communicating with Americans are slim and none, and we both know who just left town.
2. Comey is long gone and would be the first to say that he has no idea what Muller has uncovered since his firing.
Remember "what we do know", above, when Mueller presents either his next indictments and or his report on the investigation.
It will, I predict, be the linchpin for the same conspiracy charges against Americans that have been leveled against the Russians.
'Conspiracy' is the LEGAL term, the chargeable offense, for 'collusion'.
Book it.
Quote:
In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.
Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none.
(0)
(0)
