(Total Views: 346)
Posted On: 08/22/2018 4:21:39 PM
Post# of 43066
Re: Commando911 #40199
not following .. and i'm not sure who or what you are referencing
i have zero issues with LB or JA going on P2O's BoD .. i would like to see
the founder be an add to the BoD in the future .. one should know by now that
the current ceo is *conservative and methodical* as it took 18 months from March 2016 to add in October 2017 .. my guess is RH will have to interact with
LB and JA b4 agreeing to additional BoD *adds*
personally i'd welcome additional POVs .. but that isn't *imo* how RH operates
after the company's first sale .. that clearly may change
again .. i focus on what i control ..which is whether i buy/sell or hold my PTOI *shares*
currently holding
fully cognizant of my risk reward re: P2O
4kids
i have zero issues with LB or JA going on P2O's BoD .. i would like to see
the founder be an add to the BoD in the future .. one should know by now that
the current ceo is *conservative and methodical* as it took 18 months from March 2016 to add in October 2017 .. my guess is RH will have to interact with
LB and JA b4 agreeing to additional BoD *adds*
personally i'd welcome additional POVs .. but that isn't *imo* how RH operates
after the company's first sale .. that clearly may change
again .. i focus on what i control ..which is whether i buy/sell or hold my PTOI *shares*
currently holding
fully cognizant of my risk reward re: P2O
4kids
Quote:
Let me clarify...the list of perspective board members given to PTO was flat out dismissed by the CEO. The list was very distinguished as you know. Some were very eager to be on PTOs board IF they could le close a deal.
The current bod “independent”directors couldn’t hold a candle to any of the board members JW had.
(0)
(0)
