(Total Views: 353)
Posted On: 08/21/2018 4:47:12 PM
Post# of 22940
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Re: ctvette2003 #21454
Well that makes the fact you were an accessory to fraud ok then huh?
No wonder you like to associated with all the CEO scammers. You are a wannabe yourself. Idiot
looks like guilty to me. But hell you lie about everything else so why stop now huh.
No wonder you like to associated with all the CEO scammers. You are a wannabe yourself. Idiot
looks like guilty to me. But hell you lie about everything else so why stop now huh.
Quote:
The Defendants (stonington services, etal)filed a "motion to strike" ...
Quote:
In December 2004, Stonington Services, LLC (Stonington Services) was formed with XXXX as the sole owner. Subsequently, sixty percent of the interest was transferred to XXXX. XXXX and XXXX. are the current principals, with XXXX acting as the CEO and XXXX. acting as vice-president.
Quote:
Count one of the second revised complaint alleges a cause of action for fraudulent transfer pursuant to General Statutes § 52-552e(a). Count two alleges a cause of action for common law fraudulent transfer
Quote:
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the defendants' motion to strike is denied with respect to both counts.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)