(Total Views: 331)
Posted On: 07/13/2018 6:22:30 AM
Post# of 32973
Got a response from LHA (Kirsten Chapman). I think it’s a standard form response to the inquries they have been getting.
Nothing too substantial except that nFusz has been advised by its advisors and lawyers to limit disclosure of info to remain “in compliance” during this “important time.” In addition, a SHAC intended in the “near term.”
Finally, as nFusz “evolves”, the way company communicates with its shareholders “must evolve” as well.
I did not post email itself since I did not ask her consent to do so but the above is essentially the nature of the response.
Nothing too substantial except that nFusz has been advised by its advisors and lawyers to limit disclosure of info to remain “in compliance” during this “important time.” In addition, a SHAC intended in the “near term.”
Finally, as nFusz “evolves”, the way company communicates with its shareholders “must evolve” as well.
I did not post email itself since I did not ask her consent to do so but the above is essentially the nature of the response.
(8)
(0)
