You read conspiratorial nonsense, and fell for it. As the article mentioned the likelihood that Ken Starr would have NOT uncovered what you 'believe' is so slim as to be nonexistent.
Challenging the authorship of articles you disagree with, but fail to refute, with more conspiracy theory nonsense is like a dog chasing his tail. Circular reasoning I believe is the name of THAT fallacy.
The article debunked every single bat-shit claim you've fallen for, no exceptions.
Since you have an incurable case of 'whataboutism' allow me to give you some of your own medicine, again:
This and the rest of the bullet points are a virtual syllabus of your critical thinking failures.
Challenging the authorship of articles you disagree with, but fail to refute, with more conspiracy theory nonsense is like a dog chasing his tail. Circular reasoning I believe is the name of THAT fallacy.
The article debunked every single bat-shit claim you've fallen for, no exceptions.
Since you have an incurable case of 'whataboutism' allow me to give you some of your own medicine, again:
Quote:One final question to ask yourself before falling for any Clinton Body Count list: If the Chief Executive was having people bumped off left, right, and center, why aren’t Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp on this list?
At the time of Mary Mahoney’s death — a death this list hints was ordered by Clinton — neither Tripp nor Lewinsky were the high-profile household names they now are; they were complete unknowns.
It would be another six months before information about them would explode into the news. If the President were in the habit of having those dangerous to his presidency put in the ground, why didn’t he order these deaths?
This and the rest of the bullet points are a virtual syllabus of your critical thinking failures.
Quote:•If the data doesn’t fit your conclusion, ignore it. You don’t have to explain why the people who claimed to have the most damaging goods on Clinton (e.g., Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Kenneth Starr), are still walking around unscathed while dozens of bit players have been bumped off. It’s inconvenient for you, so don’t mention it.
Quote:On 10 October 1997, special prosecutor Kenneth Starr released his report on the investigation into Foster’s death, the third such investigation (after ones conducted by the coroner and Starr’s predecessor, Robert B. Fiske) of the matter.
The 114-page summary of a three-year investigation concluded that Foster shot himself with the pistol discovered in his right hand. There was no sign of a struggle, nor any evidence he’d been drugged or intoxicated or that his body had been moved.
If Foster had been murdered or if unanswered questions about his death remained, Starr would have been the last person to want to conclude the investigation prematurely.
Whatbout it, Starr is part of the 'conspiracy'?
Or are we to believe Kenneth Starr is part of the cover-up, too? And if we buy into this conspiracy theory, what are we expected to believe?
That a group of professional killers capable of furtively carrying out dozens of murders all over the world shot Vince Foster, then clumsily dumped him in a park (after he had bled out), planted a gun he didn’t own in his hand (without bothering to press his fingerprints onto it), amateurishly forged a suicide note (in several different handwritings), then expected the nation would believe his death was a suicide?
