(Total Views: 340)
Posted On: 06/06/2018 4:10:11 PM
Post# of 82690
The following was shared in a PM, by another poster, and their point is a valid one to consider!
It is time for posters to stop calling this judge crooked in posts here since there may be a remand to that court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We gain nothing by allowing that on this board EOM SAs attorneys may make sure someone on his staff sees a selection of such posts.
Obviously we don't want to "muddy the waters", considering the case may be remanded back to the same venue/Judge! Just something for everyone to consider! Although I'm hoping it all ends in the Appeals Court, with the 3-judge panel ruling in favor of SFOR, and assessing the appropriate damages (treble), including lawyer fees, etc..
It is time for posters to stop calling this judge crooked in posts here since there may be a remand to that court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We gain nothing by allowing that on this board EOM SAs attorneys may make sure someone on his staff sees a selection of such posts.
Obviously we don't want to "muddy the waters", considering the case may be remanded back to the same venue/Judge! Just something for everyone to consider! Although I'm hoping it all ends in the Appeals Court, with the 3-judge panel ruling in favor of SFOR, and assessing the appropriate damages (treble), including lawyer fees, etc..
(8)
(0)
SFOR STRONG!!! GO SFOR!!!
