(Total Views: 304)
Posted On: 05/25/2018 8:11:39 AM
Post# of 2029
i am against RSplit to OTCQB which Sorkin alluded to in CCall but by no means reverse this baby to AMEX or Nasdaq anytime.
The problem right now is people dont like the idea of a possible reverse to OTCQB but Sorkin has backpeddled somewhat sayn no reverse @ this time. Nobody saud he was going to anytime soon ita the idea of the OTCQB hanging over the stock down the road.
Sorkin imo needs to clearly states they will not reverse stick to OTCQB but that obviously wont b happening.
I hope they change their mind and try to bypass OTCQB and reverse to AMEX instead. But, there is no indication of that strategy so far for Sorkin stated OTCQB first moat likely.
CCall was clearly stating we as shareholders need to understand the possibility of doing a r split to OTCQB which imo would be disasterous bc they sell bak to low .001s too.
Need MMakers from AMEX to rid the games
The problem right now is people dont like the idea of a possible reverse to OTCQB but Sorkin has backpeddled somewhat sayn no reverse @ this time. Nobody saud he was going to anytime soon ita the idea of the OTCQB hanging over the stock down the road.
Sorkin imo needs to clearly states they will not reverse stick to OTCQB but that obviously wont b happening.
I hope they change their mind and try to bypass OTCQB and reverse to AMEX instead. But, there is no indication of that strategy so far for Sorkin stated OTCQB first moat likely.
CCall was clearly stating we as shareholders need to understand the possibility of doing a r split to OTCQB which imo would be disasterous bc they sell bak to low .001s too.
Need MMakers from AMEX to rid the games
(0)
(0)
$ACGX let the beast go already. Geez
