Ok, maybe you never came right out and said the Mexican deal was a lie, but I see from your Jan 2nd post that you claimed to have Googled it and came up empty. With so many negative posts from you, it's not much of a stretch to see that as, at the very least, implying fraudulence.

I pointed it out because I see a direct connection between the implications of fraud or misconduct contained in both that post and your last post. Either way your purpose is clear to me, and that is the spreading of doubt with non-fact based Chicken Little implications.