(Total Views: 323)
Posted On: 05/04/2018 9:18:49 AM
Post# of 43066
i find it interesting that the manipulation of an OTC company/stock (for years) and then the subsequent impact that would have on a company's abilities .. is so easily dismissed ..
it is even less believable when one sees it happen for 3 + years .. not on this OTC target .. but another OTC target also invested in .. where NRs' actions copied almost verbatim the playbook executed against P2O .. almost .. but not quite
part of the difference there is NR has had to *report* a legal short that remains 1M+ vs the 5000 to 10000 range *reported* on PTOI
but it's bogus reporting too imo .. yesterday .. anyone watching the BS played out live in a PPS range of about 2.5c .. would have seen *abusive* efforts undertaken by decoys (MMs' who odds are won't report any volume of significance to Finra for MM Monthly for May 2018) done to simulate volume and allow *reporting* re: daily reg sho %s .. to be sub 30% for the first time in 21 days
back to P2O
i don't disagree in principle that it would have been nice to have known in November 2009 when i first dipped my toe and bought my first 100 shares of PTOI @ approx 1.12 .. what i know today .. but that isn't the way it works ..
one can go thru life constantly whining/complaining/ hand wringing/denigrating or libeling past or current mgmt .. or one can learn what is done and how it's done by NR on the OTC .. and where specifically in the cycle NR *is* on any given investment regardless of where traded ..
there are no guarantees in life .. but i have no doubts many actual investors knowing what they know today .. would have liked a different decision made by the company founder and the now current ceo back in late summer 2013 .. when P2O was wrested back .. hindsight is always 20/20
part of what i posted yesterday elsewhere ..
Posted On: 05/03/2018 4:04:28 PM
Posted By: 4kids
well imo the OTC was always fungible .. it was NRs' playground which is why most OTC targets never stood a chance ..
the way i view it .. it's far wiser to spend one's time learning patterns' played by those who orchestrate by rote (forget SMB posts) but actually seeing what is being done (regardless of where a stock is *traded*) .. and understanding what that data conveys in respect to NRs' money cycles in play (UP and DOWN are always being worked) .. they are remarkably predictable imo
and i will note that if one can ascertain what happens on the OTC .. it makes seeing what is done on exchange traded stocks like taking candy from a baby
===========
i am totally clear on what i believe would kill this company .. in the very short term
the founder selling out his 3M~ shares .. and/or LB resigning from the BoD
that is it ..
4kids
it is even less believable when one sees it happen for 3 + years .. not on this OTC target .. but another OTC target also invested in .. where NRs' actions copied almost verbatim the playbook executed against P2O .. almost .. but not quite
part of the difference there is NR has had to *report* a legal short that remains 1M+ vs the 5000 to 10000 range *reported* on PTOI
but it's bogus reporting too imo .. yesterday .. anyone watching the BS played out live in a PPS range of about 2.5c .. would have seen *abusive* efforts undertaken by decoys (MMs' who odds are won't report any volume of significance to Finra for MM Monthly for May 2018) done to simulate volume and allow *reporting* re: daily reg sho %s .. to be sub 30% for the first time in 21 days
back to P2O
i don't disagree in principle that it would have been nice to have known in November 2009 when i first dipped my toe and bought my first 100 shares of PTOI @ approx 1.12 .. what i know today .. but that isn't the way it works ..
one can go thru life constantly whining/complaining/ hand wringing/denigrating or libeling past or current mgmt .. or one can learn what is done and how it's done by NR on the OTC .. and where specifically in the cycle NR *is* on any given investment regardless of where traded ..
there are no guarantees in life .. but i have no doubts many actual investors knowing what they know today .. would have liked a different decision made by the company founder and the now current ceo back in late summer 2013 .. when P2O was wrested back .. hindsight is always 20/20
part of what i posted yesterday elsewhere ..
Posted On: 05/03/2018 4:04:28 PM
Posted By: 4kids
well imo the OTC was always fungible .. it was NRs' playground which is why most OTC targets never stood a chance ..
the way i view it .. it's far wiser to spend one's time learning patterns' played by those who orchestrate by rote (forget SMB posts) but actually seeing what is being done (regardless of where a stock is *traded*) .. and understanding what that data conveys in respect to NRs' money cycles in play (UP and DOWN are always being worked) .. they are remarkably predictable imo
and i will note that if one can ascertain what happens on the OTC .. it makes seeing what is done on exchange traded stocks like taking candy from a baby
===========
i am totally clear on what i believe would kill this company .. in the very short term
the founder selling out his 3M~ shares .. and/or LB resigning from the BoD
that is it ..
4kids
(4)
(0)
