(Total Views: 264)
Posted On: 05/01/2018 11:32:42 AM
Post# of 72447
sad to say it's the OTC and they literally don't a rat's ass about these companies
the SEC is a paper tiger and has proven time and time again .. just how fungible OTC companies are to Non Retails' *interests*
that said .. nothing imo beats an educated retail investor understanding
why SMBs would be seeded and cycles of money would be worked
until they can't
here's the avgs on IPIX ..note that the S*T*R*U*G*G*L*E continues on ..
Detailed Quote:IPIX
INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS INC
0.43Down -0.0035 (-0.81 %)AS OF 11:01:28AM ET 05/01/2018
Last Trade 0.43
Trade Time 11:01:28am ET
Change -0.0035
% Change -0.81%
Bid 0.425
Bid Size 6500
Ask 0.445
Ask Size 6200
Open 0.42298
Day High 0.438
Day Low 0.42
Previous Close
04/30/2018 0.4335
52-Week High
12/06/2017 1.17
52-Week Low
04/19/2018 0.41
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
04/30/2018 -41.81%
Volume 60,719
Volume (10 day Average) 266,416
Volume (90 day Average) 211,766
yesterday i documented targeted trades (trades fed below bid showing) which per Finra can be done by NR .. this is why imo if every actual investor spent time watching live trades .. to see what is done and then tracked that *showing* vs what actually gets *reported* by those NR who *do* .. it's not too difficult to see what is being done and by whom .. it also is worth noting yesterday's efforts resulted in another plus 30% *markage* .. leaving just one *date* in weeks sub 30% ..
NR is so screwed on IPIX .. but it's been years in the making .. and imo mgmt is totally aware of what has been (and imo is being) done .. which is about 90% of this war
4kids
At some point in the past , was there not some type / kind of regulatory body that had some
type of oversight over trades such as these ? Anybody can take one look at this and see that
there is no good that can emanate from trading like this . And nowadays with modern electronic
trading systems , these egregious trades would stick out like the red flags that they are . It means
that money is being drained from us , and over time , I would suspect it would be a torrent .
the SEC is a paper tiger and has proven time and time again .. just how fungible OTC companies are to Non Retails' *interests*
that said .. nothing imo beats an educated retail investor understanding
why SMBs would be seeded and cycles of money would be worked
until they can't
here's the avgs on IPIX ..note that the S*T*R*U*G*G*L*E continues on ..
Detailed Quote:IPIX
INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS INC
0.43Down -0.0035 (-0.81 %)AS OF 11:01:28AM ET 05/01/2018
Last Trade 0.43
Trade Time 11:01:28am ET
Change -0.0035
% Change -0.81%
Bid 0.425
Bid Size 6500
Ask 0.445
Ask Size 6200
Open 0.42298
Day High 0.438
Day Low 0.42
Previous Close
04/30/2018 0.4335
52-Week High
12/06/2017 1.17
52-Week Low
04/19/2018 0.41
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
04/30/2018 -41.81%
Volume 60,719
Volume (10 day Average) 266,416
Volume (90 day Average) 211,766
yesterday i documented targeted trades (trades fed below bid showing) which per Finra can be done by NR .. this is why imo if every actual investor spent time watching live trades .. to see what is done and then tracked that *showing* vs what actually gets *reported* by those NR who *do* .. it's not too difficult to see what is being done and by whom .. it also is worth noting yesterday's efforts resulted in another plus 30% *markage* .. leaving just one *date* in weeks sub 30% ..
NR is so screwed on IPIX .. but it's been years in the making .. and imo mgmt is totally aware of what has been (and imo is being) done .. which is about 90% of this war
4kids
At some point in the past , was there not some type / kind of regulatory body that had some
type of oversight over trades such as these ? Anybody can take one look at this and see that
there is no good that can emanate from trading like this . And nowadays with modern electronic
trading systems , these egregious trades would stick out like the red flags that they are . It means
that money is being drained from us , and over time , I would suspect it would be a torrent .
(5)
(0)
