It would be helpful if you mentioned that that is referenced from 2 different sources although it is exactly the same article. The way you posted it is confusing otherwise.

Interesting development though, although I will point out that Wang as CEO (of the subsidiary ONLY) being the common point is not an indicator that this company has anything to do with our ticker. It could be a source of revenue, however.

We are hoping to see some more developments on it soon, especially in whatever role it will have with the shake tree deal.