(Total Views: 309)
Posted On: 04/04/2018 3:07:33 AM
Post# of 72443
Truth means you have proofs to back up your claim. I bet Leo and Sullivan would love to have those proofs to sue the naked shorts. If your speculation turns out to be wrong, then you deceived investors inadvertently. I would hate to hear some honest hard-working people miss out this potential life-changing stock because of it. Science isn’t the only factor for some investors. They also weigh in other factors such as short interest. They might not understand every scientific term but they understand high short interest means more people are betting on the stock to fail.
Think about why Leo didn’t mention Mako’s attack or Rosen’s lawsuit during presentations. That actually happenend and according to you, investors should know the truth. But Leo didn’t say a word because he knew those negative news wouldn’t attract investors/partners. Sometimes it’s not the things you say, but the things you don’t say, are needed for the greater good. That’s doesn’t mean you are lying.
For example, Toyota wants customers to buy their new Prius. In the commercial they mentioned the MPG (positive) but they didn’t mention the 0-60 time (negative). Did they lie about the 0-60 time? Not really. They didn’t mention the negative because they want more customers to buy the car. If you really want more investors to buy IPIX, please consider promoting the positives instead of the negatives.
I don’t mind doing a poll on whether readers prefer this board to focus more on science or on manipulations.
Think about why Leo didn’t mention Mako’s attack or Rosen’s lawsuit during presentations. That actually happenend and according to you, investors should know the truth. But Leo didn’t say a word because he knew those negative news wouldn’t attract investors/partners. Sometimes it’s not the things you say, but the things you don’t say, are needed for the greater good. That’s doesn’t mean you are lying.
For example, Toyota wants customers to buy their new Prius. In the commercial they mentioned the MPG (positive) but they didn’t mention the 0-60 time (negative). Did they lie about the 0-60 time? Not really. They didn’t mention the negative because they want more customers to buy the car. If you really want more investors to buy IPIX, please consider promoting the positives instead of the negatives.
I don’t mind doing a poll on whether readers prefer this board to focus more on science or on manipulations.
(8)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼