(Total Views: 361)
Posted On: 03/29/2018 10:50:55 AM
Post# of 82692
So our brief conclusion asks the Judge for trial:
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, StrikeForce respectfully requests
that this Court: reverse the decision dismissing StrikeForce’s Complaint with
prejudice; find that the Asserted Claims are in fact patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C.§ 101; and remand for trial.
Should we get what we ask for and a trial is arranged, and assuming they don't settle before, how long would a trial stretch things out? Another year or more? I'm not asking because I'm worried about waiting. I'm looking for definitive precedent on our ruling that will allow us to slam dunk the next 50 cases without conflict.
BFG
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, StrikeForce respectfully requests
that this Court: reverse the decision dismissing StrikeForce’s Complaint with
prejudice; find that the Asserted Claims are in fact patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C.§ 101; and remand for trial.
Should we get what we ask for and a trial is arranged, and assuming they don't settle before, how long would a trial stretch things out? Another year or more? I'm not asking because I'm worried about waiting. I'm looking for definitive precedent on our ruling that will allow us to slam dunk the next 50 cases without conflict.
BFG
(1)
(0)
