(Total Views: 380)
Posted On: 03/23/2018 3:51:36 PM
Post# of 82689
I'm still reviewing the case but it appears to be a similar case as SFOR .
Check out DSS today. 1.54+0.45 (+41.28%)
Court of Appeals rules for DSS in Apple case.
In response to two petitions for inter partes review filed by Appellee Apple Inc. (“Apple”), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) issued a pair of final written decisions finding claim .... Because we find that the Board did not
provide a sufficient explanation for its conclusions, and
because we cannot glean any such explanation from the record, we reverse.
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/fi...2018.1.PDF
Check out DSS today. 1.54+0.45 (+41.28%)
Court of Appeals rules for DSS in Apple case.
In response to two petitions for inter partes review filed by Appellee Apple Inc. (“Apple”), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) issued a pair of final written decisions finding claim .... Because we find that the Board did not
provide a sufficient explanation for its conclusions, and
because we cannot glean any such explanation from the record, we reverse.
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/fi...2018.1.PDF
(6)
(0)
