(Total Views: 284)
Posted On: 03/17/2018 1:30:09 PM
Post# of 43066
it is no secret NR non retail has targeted OTC companies (and stocks) and by default .. various SMBs .. what is unique about P2O is the company's ability to remain (as of today) an OTC SURVIVOR with a beyond enviable I/O .. the reality is P2O's mgmt has numerous options .. almost none of which are ever discussed
trolls' job is to divert and deflect (create FUD) .. which clearly has not worked on P2O investors .. as can be measured by the incredible *reduction* of YOY volume since P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. one can also check the shareholders of record since 2013's K was filed for its total *consistency*
P2O is in a sector in its ascension .. there is competition (which imo is always healthy) .. .. suspect i am not alone in seeing true competition of P2O's actually coming public re: street's valuation
the easiest aspect for NR to attack/target is a company's PPS .. when that clearly fails to actually part *actual* investors from their shares (or force mgmt into toxic financing) .. note that NR goes after actual P2O investors .. not content with maligning current/former mgmt .and/or current/former directors on a daily basis
no one spends time on a SMB for years without a financial interest .. everyone here knows why investors have an interest .. NRs' *efforts* clearly speak for themselves
lastly .. no one here knows mgmt's intent .. RH has always kept *intent* beyond close to the vest .. his intent to seat a BoD .. took 18 months from when articulated in an update in March 2016 .. but what is clear *imo* is that this next round out of P2O .. indicates RHs' *intent* specific to P2O going forward .. one can argue merits of external/internal sales .. one can argue the merits of needing a site for flagship .. or having first sales be sites for P2O's technology
i've noted for years .. that no two customers will have the same requirements for P2O's tech
what this actual investor would like to see is an Update that accompanies the K being filed
the odds of that happening (based on RH's prior patterns) aren't in my favor ..
regardless the next 8 weeks imo *reveals* all re: RH's intent
4kids
trolls' job is to divert and deflect (create FUD) .. which clearly has not worked on P2O investors .. as can be measured by the incredible *reduction* of YOY volume since P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. one can also check the shareholders of record since 2013's K was filed for its total *consistency*
P2O is in a sector in its ascension .. there is competition (which imo is always healthy) .. .. suspect i am not alone in seeing true competition of P2O's actually coming public re: street's valuation
the easiest aspect for NR to attack/target is a company's PPS .. when that clearly fails to actually part *actual* investors from their shares (or force mgmt into toxic financing) .. note that NR goes after actual P2O investors .. not content with maligning current/former mgmt .and/or current/former directors on a daily basis
no one spends time on a SMB for years without a financial interest .. everyone here knows why investors have an interest .. NRs' *efforts* clearly speak for themselves
lastly .. no one here knows mgmt's intent .. RH has always kept *intent* beyond close to the vest .. his intent to seat a BoD .. took 18 months from when articulated in an update in March 2016 .. but what is clear *imo* is that this next round out of P2O .. indicates RHs' *intent* specific to P2O going forward .. one can argue merits of external/internal sales .. one can argue the merits of needing a site for flagship .. or having first sales be sites for P2O's technology
i've noted for years .. that no two customers will have the same requirements for P2O's tech
what this actual investor would like to see is an Update that accompanies the K being filed
the odds of that happening (based on RH's prior patterns) aren't in my favor ..
regardless the next 8 weeks imo *reveals* all re: RH's intent
4kids
(2)
(0)
