(Total Views: 568)
Posted On: 03/09/2018 5:58:57 PM
Post# of 82677
Re: Stargazer2000 #19613
8m # is correct but that was when SFOR had Comcast and others as their client and not for Q42017. On Feb 22nd, 2017 we had this discussion and Maronti1 shared the email response from Kay back than. 8m # is sitting on ACS website since 2016/17 when we first found that.
That # is most likely very important when ACS/SFOR is going after large clients to show the viability of products and clients like Comcast to current list of
clients like McAfee / Intel / TPG /First Data / DOD / etc as evident from the first webinar.
It is important to set our expectation correct.
However, considering what is going on here, I have very high expectations from several large deals and these # will be peanuts in the long run. My2C
That # is most likely very important when ACS/SFOR is going after large clients to show the viability of products and clients like Comcast to current list of
clients like McAfee / Intel / TPG /First Data / DOD / etc as evident from the first webinar.
It is important to set our expectation correct.
However, considering what is going on here, I have very high expectations from several large deals and these # will be peanuts in the long run. My2C
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
