(Total Views: 834)
Posted On: 02/18/2018 2:56:53 PM
Post# of 82676
Hope this helps:
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/initial-coin-offering/
Keep in mind, SFOR created this subsidiary (Blocksafe Tech) too focus on blockchain and cryptocurrency/wallets security.
Blocksafe Tech will be having a Pre ICO and ICO in the next few weeks to month or two. That will hopefully raise the funding needed to create more revs for SFOR through licensing to Blocksafe tech and R&D expenses.
This could be very big if properly excecuted.
ON a side note the last couple of interviews weren't as "deep" as I would like, but was enlightening enough. Kay cleared up the rumors created by some on the other board a few months back about the Protectid patents not being valid because of the dristrict court ruling. the patents are valid, the claims are what SFOR attorneys appealed. District court rulings are being overturned countless times by Federal Cicuit. Looking very good for SFOR.
But no guarantees.
GL
IMO
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/initial-coin-offering/
Keep in mind, SFOR created this subsidiary (Blocksafe Tech) too focus on blockchain and cryptocurrency/wallets security.
Blocksafe Tech will be having a Pre ICO and ICO in the next few weeks to month or two. That will hopefully raise the funding needed to create more revs for SFOR through licensing to Blocksafe tech and R&D expenses.
This could be very big if properly excecuted.
ON a side note the last couple of interviews weren't as "deep" as I would like, but was enlightening enough. Kay cleared up the rumors created by some on the other board a few months back about the Protectid patents not being valid because of the dristrict court ruling. the patents are valid, the claims are what SFOR attorneys appealed. District court rulings are being overturned countless times by Federal Cicuit. Looking very good for SFOR.
But no guarantees.
GL
IMO
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
