(Total Views: 359)
Posted On: 02/07/2018 10:15:53 PM
Post# of 82687
Exactly!
Our board is just the reverse of iHub’s.
As SFOR becomes more and more successful, their days are clearly numbered here.
Our motto should be: we support only legitimate posters!
A little history: In 1957 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that censorship of pornography was valid/acceptable because pornography has “no socially redeeming value”.
I believe that censorship of the bashers on this board is equally valid, justified, and acceptable because they have “no socially redeeming value”, i.e. they make no overall contribution to this board or our society of investors!
Our board is just the reverse of iHub’s.
As SFOR becomes more and more successful, their days are clearly numbered here.
Our motto should be: we support only legitimate posters!
A little history: In 1957 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that censorship of pornography was valid/acceptable because pornography has “no socially redeeming value”.
I believe that censorship of the bashers on this board is equally valid, justified, and acceptable because they have “no socially redeeming value”, i.e. they make no overall contribution to this board or our society of investors!
(4)
(0)
