Horseshit, Snopes debunks the right and the left which blows your argument.

I see that you're having trouble reading again. Snopes' financial and legal troubles do not indicate that their fact checking model is flawed, much less dishonest.

And posting some complaints from one of you 'food conspiracy' sites doesn't pass the laugh test!

Quote:

---

Mikkelson has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias, but insists that the same debunking standards are applied to all political urban legends.[23]

In 2012, FactCheck.org reviewed a sample of Snopes' responses to political rumors regarding George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, and Barack Obama, and found them to be free from bias in all cases.[23][24]

In 2012, The Florida Times-Union reported that About.com's urban legends researcher found a "consistent effort to provide even-handed analyses" and that Snopes' cited sources and numerous reputable analyses of its content confirm its accuracy.[25]

Critics of the site have falsely asserted that it is funded by businessman and philanthropist George Soros, or linked sites, but all of Snopes’s revenue is from advertising on the site.[2] The New York Times has stated:

---