(Total Views: 337)
Posted On: 01/29/2018 10:53:03 PM
Post# of 72448
Not that you should listen to Moose or anyone else you label as a crook, but here's some good reasons to not believe there is a large naked short position provided by our beloved Sox.
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4924397
I have also introduced a simple formula to get an estimation of the naked short position:
Previous three days volume with no FTDs = a rough ceiling of the naked short interest.
So if you prefer Sox's deduction, my mathematical proof or, ...whatever it is Moose proposed, there is plenty of reason to not believe the large NSS proof. If you still prefer Alan's thoughts though that's fine. It's a free country after all. No such thing as an illegal idea.
Also, I hope everything is OK health wise, brother. I need you healthy for the celebration.
Go IPIX!
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4924397
I have also introduced a simple formula to get an estimation of the naked short position:
Previous three days volume with no FTDs = a rough ceiling of the naked short interest.
So if you prefer Sox's deduction, my mathematical proof or, ...whatever it is Moose proposed, there is plenty of reason to not believe the large NSS proof. If you still prefer Alan's thoughts though that's fine. It's a free country after all. No such thing as an illegal idea.
Also, I hope everything is OK health wise, brother. I need you healthy for the celebration.
Go IPIX!
(1)
(0)
All my posts are my own personal opinion and speculation. They should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. No, I am not Scottsmith.
