(Total Views: 400)
Posted On: 01/26/2018 1:26:43 PM
Post# of 15187
I agree X10. good points. Also, I see the SEC more concerned
with companies that have depleted all their cash, resources, and floats; while they profited on their stock options/selling shares. Then, moving to the block chain to use their name/recognition to garner attention and a new round of suckers.
Fore-instance, I can see an Enron type company that used to be a real
functioning entity, going bk, and then using their former business as a front for crypto. That they are now going to develop new energy devices, trying
to pretend to now be an intellectual properties developer. They would hide in the conceptual aspect of the block chain. Unsuspecting investors would still assume they are an energy provider.
Since HJOE is transferring our original shares over, this will be a major
difference and substantiating the validity of Hangover Joes business/intentions/scalability. They are not
screwing the investor. This is a major feather in HJOE's hat and legitimises the move and company.
TS
with companies that have depleted all their cash, resources, and floats; while they profited on their stock options/selling shares. Then, moving to the block chain to use their name/recognition to garner attention and a new round of suckers.
Fore-instance, I can see an Enron type company that used to be a real
functioning entity, going bk, and then using their former business as a front for crypto. That they are now going to develop new energy devices, trying
to pretend to now be an intellectual properties developer. They would hide in the conceptual aspect of the block chain. Unsuspecting investors would still assume they are an energy provider.
Since HJOE is transferring our original shares over, this will be a major
difference and substantiating the validity of Hangover Joes business/intentions/scalability. They are not
screwing the investor. This is a major feather in HJOE's hat and legitimises the move and company.
TS
(4)
(0)
