(Total Views: 290)
Posted On: 01/19/2018 8:10:24 AM
Post# of 72447
Sox: You are making my point:
"So yes, if you search you can find isolated instances where the SEC claimed it was going to put a stop to abusive naked shorting and in a few cases have actually gone after perpetrators normally accepting a token fine and a promise not to do it again as punishment. In the meantime investors continue to have their pockets picked and small companies continue to be driven to bankruptcy while regulators wink and look the other way. If you can't see that IPIX has been hurt badly by those selling shares that do not exist into the market you are in denial. Those air shares have driven down the share price causing the outstanding (even though Leo has worked hard to limit this) to be larger than it would have been had Aspire been able to sell the shares he did for more per share."
Go IPIX!!!
"So yes, if you search you can find isolated instances where the SEC claimed it was going to put a stop to abusive naked shorting and in a few cases have actually gone after perpetrators normally accepting a token fine and a promise not to do it again as punishment. In the meantime investors continue to have their pockets picked and small companies continue to be driven to bankruptcy while regulators wink and look the other way. If you can't see that IPIX has been hurt badly by those selling shares that do not exist into the market you are in denial. Those air shares have driven down the share price causing the outstanding (even though Leo has worked hard to limit this) to be larger than it would have been had Aspire been able to sell the shares he did for more per share."
Go IPIX!!!
(4)
(0)
