(Total Views: 246)
Posted On: 01/16/2018 1:36:57 PM
Post# of 82676
Re: Hate Liars #14998
It has now been 45 days since this announcement with both Blank Rome and Ropes & Gray teams involved with the appeal. Prediction: A Tital Wave is coming....
StrikeForce Technologies To Immediately Appeal Court’s Ruling
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (OTC PINK:SFOR). On December 1, 2017, The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion in the StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corp. case, which invalidated claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701 under 35 U.S.C. §101. StrikeForce strongly disagrees with the court’s decision and intends to immediately appeal the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit once the court enters final judgment. StrikeForce has agreed to stay its patent litigations in the District of New Jersey against Centrify Corp. and Duo Security Inc. pending the appeal. StrikeForce believes that the litigations currently pending in the District of Massachusetts should also be stayed pending appeal and is discussing such a motion with the defendants in that case.
StrikeForce Technologies To Immediately Appeal Court’s Ruling
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (OTC PINK:SFOR). On December 1, 2017, The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion in the StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corp. case, which invalidated claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701 under 35 U.S.C. §101. StrikeForce strongly disagrees with the court’s decision and intends to immediately appeal the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit once the court enters final judgment. StrikeForce has agreed to stay its patent litigations in the District of New Jersey against Centrify Corp. and Duo Security Inc. pending the appeal. StrikeForce believes that the litigations currently pending in the District of Massachusetts should also be stayed pending appeal and is discussing such a motion with the defendants in that case.
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
