(Total Views: 406)
Posted On: 01/12/2018 10:36:49 PM
Post# of 4081
I agree the burden of proof is pretty high right now. The antitrust issue will also be hard to argue since I just remembered that there is also twitter. Of the big 4 sites (IHub, IHang, twitter, claytrader), IHub and twitter have the biggest impact on the share price, so a monopoly will be hard to prove.
If we can examine a specific post that is clearly an SEC violation and examine the time and sales immediately after, first we have to see a correlation. Second, we would have to prove that such things never occur on twitter, which is a problem.
I also agree that IHub should burn, but there are only 2 ways that would happen.
1. If the Admins' identities were somehow leaked
2. If the site were hacked.
If we can examine a specific post that is clearly an SEC violation and examine the time and sales immediately after, first we have to see a correlation. Second, we would have to prove that such things never occur on twitter, which is a problem.
I also agree that IHub should burn, but there are only 2 ways that would happen.
1. If the Admins' identities were somehow leaked
2. If the site were hacked.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
