(Total Views: 265)
Posted On: 01/01/2018 8:16:28 PM
Post# of 72443
As I expected, an untruth was stated, and then an additional untruth was stated -- this being that the words that were clearly displayed in the initial post didn't mean what they meant.
The claim was that
And that is just plain untrue. There WAS a spike in volume. I myself consider about 4 times and about 8 times the average daily volume to be a tremendously large spike, and so does anyone who is not trying to twist the truth.
We have disagreements here about things like what the short interest figures mean. Those are being posted in good faith by the parties to the argument.
This claim about volume is a lie.
The claim was that
Quote:
When CTIX changed to IPIX we didn't have a tremendously large spike in volume.
And that is just plain untrue. There WAS a spike in volume. I myself consider about 4 times and about 8 times the average daily volume to be a tremendously large spike, and so does anyone who is not trying to twist the truth.
We have disagreements here about things like what the short interest figures mean. Those are being posted in good faith by the parties to the argument.
This claim about volume is a lie.
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
