Yes , it could be said they made mistakes.
No doubt they did or the plant wouldn't have closed permanently after a years time.
But there is no existing proof, nor has any statement ever been made, behind the idea it was because they backed Agylix.
It may be true....and it may not.....that would only be a guess on your part that can't be supported.
If you have a link share it.
It can just as easily be guessed it failed because of gross mismanagement, unrealistic timelines, lack of proper funding, cost of transporting feedstock, cost of feedstock, or any assortment of other scenarios.
But let's for the sake of argument say you guessed correctly.
Making mistakes that waste multiple millions of investment dollars is not simp!y to be scoffed at as ...'its part of life and you mature'.
That's nonsense.
It was a monumetal error of judgement to use a machine that with proper research, testing, and vetting a responsible company and it's principals should have seen beforehand.
That can not be disputed if true.

That doesn't add to credibility.....it takes it away under any scenario.

Check my past posts. I am an investor.
And you assume I celebrate Christmas.
Neither of which should matter to the topic at hand.