(Total Views: 311)
Posted On: 12/08/2017 9:42:56 AM
Post# of 82668
Ropes & Gray's argument, in a responsel to the Office action or in an appeal, might say that the Examiner and/or the Office action have committed a procedural error, and failed to analyze all of the claim limitations. The assertion that the claim limitations considered as a whole are not significantly more than the abstract idea is an unsupported allegation, because the claim limitations as a whole have not been considered. The only claim limitations cited in the rejection are claim # 53 i.e.e https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4866692 and remainder of the claim limitations have neither been cited nor analyzed. Because the Office action has a procedural error, the rejection is improper and invalid, and should be withdrawn.
Seen it before, Take all other 43 claims from the IPR and nail these peeps.
So true ZP!!
Seen it before, Take all other 43 claims from the IPR and nail these peeps.
So true ZP!!
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)