Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Zerify Inc ZRFY
(Total Views: 342)
Posted On: 12/02/2017 1:00:56 PM
Post# of 82687
Avatar
Posted By: Ez_Stepper
I know a lot of us are investigating and speculating while trying to achieve some clarity.

Is it possible that

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT.87 ) The Motion is GRANTED with prejudice. Because it has been determined that the Asserted Patents are invalid,

is referring to section 1 or an amended item from the following Z jumpshare?

https://jumpshare.com/v/1tyhRJKxEPIkeTkxMdrV

It looks like SecureAuth tried to use some patents to justify their arguments. Could it be those patents that are invalid?

Thanks













(1)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site