I know a lot of us are investigating and speculating while trying to achieve some clarity.

Is it possible that

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT.87 ) The Motion is GRANTED with prejudice. Because it has been determined that the Asserted Patents are invalid,

is referring to section 1 or an amended item from the following Z jumpshare?

https://jumpshare.com/v/1tyhRJKxEPIkeTkxMdrV

It looks like SecureAuth tried to use some patents to justify their arguments. Could it be those patents that are invalid?

Thanks