(Total Views: 245)
Posted On: 11/29/2017 12:09:06 PM
Post# of 96881
Re: 2015invest #86081
I also answered the questionnaire last night after thinking about it for several days.
I answered truthfully
I listed a 7.00 per share price, but I followed up with a statement to the same effect. I prefer not to be sold out or taken over.
To be honest, we now see David speaking up and responding to questions specifically and in detail.
The idea that the company is asking our advice regarding the forced sale of our shares just doesn't make sense. David is here letting us know that the future of NTEK's Future of Streaming is about to come together.
Why would the company plan to separate us from the future benefits of the ownership of the Future of Streaming and at the same time start to tell us how close they are to being there and how many technical problems they have seen and countered, and how good it is actually going to be?
I think that the company is doing something else. Their stated goal is to get to know us better. That also sounds positive. They seem to be encouraging us to attend the annual meeting, and they want to know how many votes we will be bringing with us???
I am where I am. I am not going to assume that what is going on now is a negative, or that people in the know, such as David, are acting one way and planning another with regard to us. That doesn't sound like the David many of you who know him have described him.
There may be something for which they need our votes. If there is I assume that they will advise.
I think the company is doing something else
I answered truthfully
I listed a 7.00 per share price, but I followed up with a statement to the same effect. I prefer not to be sold out or taken over.
To be honest, we now see David speaking up and responding to questions specifically and in detail.
The idea that the company is asking our advice regarding the forced sale of our shares just doesn't make sense. David is here letting us know that the future of NTEK's Future of Streaming is about to come together.
Why would the company plan to separate us from the future benefits of the ownership of the Future of Streaming and at the same time start to tell us how close they are to being there and how many technical problems they have seen and countered, and how good it is actually going to be?
I think that the company is doing something else. Their stated goal is to get to know us better. That also sounds positive. They seem to be encouraging us to attend the annual meeting, and they want to know how many votes we will be bringing with us???
I am where I am. I am not going to assume that what is going on now is a negative, or that people in the know, such as David, are acting one way and planning another with regard to us. That doesn't sound like the David many of you who know him have described him.
There may be something for which they need our votes. If there is I assume that they will advise.
I think the company is doing something else
(7)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼