Do you happen to have the docket that listed Entrust's complaint against SFOR? I would like to read it to try to come to a conclusion as to how much merit the case would have and to speculate on how much leverage they really had. Looking at SFOR's sales, that alone tells me they didn't have much let alone if the patents claim had any merit. The more I think about it, the less leverage I think they truly had. If R&G is on contingency, which this past 10-Q tells me is the case (JMHO has I can't 100% know) then they would have fought the case for us for free most likely (also my opinion only). Please let me know - liking how this looks.