the point is totally true .. as anyone who has had the conversation knows well

the reality is current CEO tried one idea of external sales .. and that didn't fly
now after a year and a half of waiting for ancillary material events to be filed
and implemented .. P2O (company) has added 2 new voices to the BoD

that works for this actual investor .. but it's not all i (or others) are looking for ..
imo every actual P2O investor will know within a Q of the 2 adds .. if *focus and
intent* is articulated and executed ..

bottom line remains ..

P2O is compliant .. and still survives .. and as has been shown rather clearly
since the 23rd of October .. (T+2) .. NR has had to *mark* significantly higher
daily reg sho %s .. since the *volume* .. done post filings showing what was
bought on the open mkt by one of the 2 BoD/s

i tend to not ignore the elephant in the room

and the founder retains his 3M~ PTOI shares .. when he sells .. everyone will know it

because as i noted in the summer of 2016 .. when founder sells out .. PTOI's
volume in one week .. will *shatter* the still to this day record setting (and set up
by NR) month of April 2011's 8M~

as for start ups .. i'm an investor (and have been for years) in 2 who were start ups
for the decade + b4 they came public (exchange traded) neither are profitable
but both are in sectors in their ascension (decade + en route) .. P2O's sector
is in its ascension .. regardless of what gets posted *here* or via the vehicle of
choice where *originals* are never too far away

4kids

Quote:

---

Ok, true to a point. But there are plenty of facts, whether we like them or not, that support the fact that PTO has misstepped, mislead and been mismanaged over the last 8 yrs.

The companies lack of success surely isn’t just because it’s a start up in an emerging sector.

The facts are pleasant, but they are facts. We can all have different opinions, but we can’t create our own facts.

---