(Total Views: 48)
Posted On: 11/04/2017 3:54:45 PM
Post# of 127539
Re: wowhappens28 #4827
Indictment of Trump employees and associates, together with a continuing investigation, IS the evidence that you allege does not exist.
Otherwise the indictments would have been accompanied by an announcement of the closing of the investigation.
What I said was IF there is evidence warranting investigation of Hillary lets see the investigation. After all, it IS a GOP run DOJ.
But I'll go a step further, there is no 'crime' committed within Party primaries but rather hard-ball politicking. Was Jeb guilty of crimes in commissioning opo research on Trump that morphed into more opo research by the Dems on Trump?
Please DO bring charges of treason and bribery, should the evidence exist. REAL evidence, not free range righty 'wet dreams' like you posted. Do you even know what constitutes legal evidence?
So you've done what you righties so often do, misstated my position and run with it like a scalded cat. It is a lot easier to do that than to argue with what I actually posted, right?
Otherwise the indictments would have been accompanied by an announcement of the closing of the investigation.
Quote:
He keeps wanting investigations of Trump even though these is no current evidence.
Quote:
Yet he says there is not need to investigate miss corruption, Hillary, even though there is evidence from Donna Brazil, Assange, and the muted witness that Hillary committed MAJOR offenses of major election tampering, treason and bribery.
What I said was IF there is evidence warranting investigation of Hillary lets see the investigation. After all, it IS a GOP run DOJ.
But I'll go a step further, there is no 'crime' committed within Party primaries but rather hard-ball politicking. Was Jeb guilty of crimes in commissioning opo research on Trump that morphed into more opo research by the Dems on Trump?
Please DO bring charges of treason and bribery, should the evidence exist. REAL evidence, not free range righty 'wet dreams' like you posted. Do you even know what constitutes legal evidence?
So you've done what you righties so often do, misstated my position and run with it like a scalded cat. It is a lot easier to do that than to argue with what I actually posted, right?
(0)
(0)
