(Total Views: 384)
Posted On: 10/18/2017 6:58:06 AM
Post# of 82686
Currently SFOR OS is at 2.3B +/- shares.
To be at $1.00 it would have to be valued at $2.30B
To be at $0.50 it would have to be valued at $1.15B
To bo at $0.25 it would have to be valued at $0.575B = $575M
NOW If these lawsuits average a $30M settlement with royalties and SFOR collects on all 7 current infringers, SFOR would get $210M.
Sfor would net 60%+/- after lawyer fees, so they would have $120M to do as they please with it.
NOW on a valuation (especially if they have royalties) you have a multiple of about 10X. So SFOR could be valued at $1.2B if averything I pointed out falls into place.
What was NOT included in the above example is forward looking estimate. This would increase the valuation based on future litigation (20‑30 more large infringers), contracts that should be announced before year end, new and international patents (should also be announced before year end), $9M collectable by 9/2020 from ACS for MT & GID patents...
So nothing is set in stone yet... but I can hear Entrust chiseling away with others to follow.
Hope this helps
Please verify and do your own DD.
GL
IMO
To be at $1.00 it would have to be valued at $2.30B
To be at $0.50 it would have to be valued at $1.15B
To bo at $0.25 it would have to be valued at $0.575B = $575M
NOW If these lawsuits average a $30M settlement with royalties and SFOR collects on all 7 current infringers, SFOR would get $210M.
Sfor would net 60%+/- after lawyer fees, so they would have $120M to do as they please with it.
NOW on a valuation (especially if they have royalties) you have a multiple of about 10X. So SFOR could be valued at $1.2B if averything I pointed out falls into place.
What was NOT included in the above example is forward looking estimate. This would increase the valuation based on future litigation (20‑30 more large infringers), contracts that should be announced before year end, new and international patents (should also be announced before year end), $9M collectable by 9/2020 from ACS for MT & GID patents...
So nothing is set in stone yet... but I can hear Entrust chiseling away with others to follow.
Hope this helps
Please verify and do your own DD.
GL
IMO
(4)
(0)
