(Total Views: 235)
Posted On: 10/15/2017 5:16:50 PM
Post# of 43065
Re: Commando911 #37578
well i'm glad we got that cleared up re: the founder's tech .. because i and others have wondered what is trying to be communicated via those (some do call them bashing or soft bashing) posts ..
no one has ever said the ?s weren't legit .. the issue becomes *who* can answer them
no one here can ..
btw .. i'm not pissed .. what i am is frustrated by the total lack of communication out of P2O's mgmt .. but i also recognize why keeping sealed lips makes total sense across many levels ..
mgmt will do what they do .. when they do it .. not one suggestion has been offered via this SMB .. as to *hurry* that time line out of RH.. so to me while serious ?s .. somewhat repetitive and pretty much unanswerable by retail investors
4kids
no one has ever said the ?s weren't legit .. the issue becomes *who* can answer them
no one here can ..
btw .. i'm not pissed .. what i am is frustrated by the total lack of communication out of P2O's mgmt .. but i also recognize why keeping sealed lips makes total sense across many levels ..
mgmt will do what they do .. when they do it .. not one suggestion has been offered via this SMB .. as to *hurry* that time line out of RH.. so to me while serious ?s .. somewhat repetitive and pretty much unanswerable by retail investors
4kids
Quote:
Never said that, and please don’t insinuate that I did. I asked very pertinent question for the board. No bash there.
Any REASONABLE PERSON would want to know.
You call it bashing because you can’t answer and in reality are just as pissed off.
The questions are very legitimate.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
