(Total Views: 240)
Posted On: 10/11/2017 2:12:41 PM
Post# of 43066
"you are the 2nd hit piece author on P2O .. which like the first hit piece author and an elgindy protege .. had a direct impact on PTOI .. imagine that"
My article was completely accurate in every respect. I didn't receive a dime for it--it was solely for the benefit of investors who I believe were getting swindled. Even after everything played out, you can see how the article is still relevant--there are still continuous delays on starting up this supposedly wildly profitable processor. Anyone who listened to me five years ago when PTOI was at $1.40, saved a boatload. Five years was plenty of time for PTOI to prove me wrong...yet they didn't because an extra $20M or so just still wasn't quite enough to start up the processor.
Read it again and tell me if you can find a single false statement: https://seekingalpha.com/article/319080-john-...n-of-worms
Here's an angle you haven't considered...what if the founder, with several hundred thousand dollars from friends and family from his Expedite2 shell, decided to do a sham operation again with a new shell called 310 Holdings/JBII/PTOI??...this time with a story about a secret catalyst, along with a bunch of half truths and outright lies, and sold the garbage-to-gold story to investors?? What if PTOI's Mr. Bordynuik got rich by his design, rather than merely accidentally getting rich paying himself handsomely while the company kept failing??
What if PTOI founder, Mr. Bordynuik, simply pulled a 'green' penny stock swindle like many other penny stock operators routinely do because the money is extraordinarily easy?? All it takes is a half truth and a lot of hype. Is it possible investors lost money because PTOI's process was grossly misrepresented to them by PTOI itself, which convinced them to buy a worthless sham at an extraordinarily high price...and then the real reason for the 'relentless compression' of the share price might have been due to investors slowly figuring out that PTOI's processor really couldn't produce diesel for under $10/bbl or $0.25/gallon??
My article was completely accurate in every respect. I didn't receive a dime for it--it was solely for the benefit of investors who I believe were getting swindled. Even after everything played out, you can see how the article is still relevant--there are still continuous delays on starting up this supposedly wildly profitable processor. Anyone who listened to me five years ago when PTOI was at $1.40, saved a boatload. Five years was plenty of time for PTOI to prove me wrong...yet they didn't because an extra $20M or so just still wasn't quite enough to start up the processor.
Read it again and tell me if you can find a single false statement: https://seekingalpha.com/article/319080-john-...n-of-worms
Here's an angle you haven't considered...what if the founder, with several hundred thousand dollars from friends and family from his Expedite2 shell, decided to do a sham operation again with a new shell called 310 Holdings/JBII/PTOI??...this time with a story about a secret catalyst, along with a bunch of half truths and outright lies, and sold the garbage-to-gold story to investors?? What if PTOI's Mr. Bordynuik got rich by his design, rather than merely accidentally getting rich paying himself handsomely while the company kept failing??
What if PTOI founder, Mr. Bordynuik, simply pulled a 'green' penny stock swindle like many other penny stock operators routinely do because the money is extraordinarily easy?? All it takes is a half truth and a lot of hype. Is it possible investors lost money because PTOI's process was grossly misrepresented to them by PTOI itself, which convinced them to buy a worthless sham at an extraordinarily high price...and then the real reason for the 'relentless compression' of the share price might have been due to investors slowly figuring out that PTOI's processor really couldn't produce diesel for under $10/bbl or $0.25/gallon??
(0)
(0)
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.
