Ok, we agree he’s clueless. You are more diplomatic, but we agree. He also, and I will try to be more diplomatic, “misinformed” investors in regard to the intent of monies infused by others in regard to repairing machine 3. He also “misinformed” sha holders in regard to holding an AGM in 2017. I say this because I believe we are getting close to the required amount of notice that must be given to shareholders prior to the meeting.

So can we agree, that these two facts alone constitute a bit of malfeasance on the ceos part? Regardless of what Shareholders can or are willing to do about that.