(Total Views: 305)
Posted On: 10/03/2017 9:41:40 AM
Post# of 43066
what i find remarkable is the seemingly total lack of awareness by some who
proclaim to have an interest in P2O
today one of my alternative energy company's (awareness of for years which
includes the recognition of the trading patterns in play by NR which *infect*
every US equity regardless of where traded .. which certainly wasn't *known*
10 years ago) .. after numerous R/S .. (to survive) that were re-shorted .. the company
had news some might consider it both *disruptive* and worth noting because of the impact
it *should* have on the company's PPS
but here is the thing .. the dolts (SEC) just acknowledged something recently that
some of us have wondered about for years .. how could the PPS gyrations on
targets have such a whipsaw UP only to be *re-shorted* right back down >> and that *volume*
and low and behold .. we now know why .. the SEC itself (EDGAR) was hacked
so back on 9.21.2017 this other alternative company *traded* up about 30c .. on volume that shouldn't
have passed anyone's smell test .. if they actually understood basics like *floats*
what those who had an interest learned .. was the hacking of Edgar allowed
those NR entities to *trade* off of news .. in advance of it being publicly filed and digested
our system is totally flawed and corrupt .. and NR utilized SMBs .. which most
with functioning gray matter recognize are sites for *opinions* .. when i see
a troll trot out posts from 2013/2014 .. most can recognize the tactic .. when a troll conflates
words very specific to the *technology* (disruptive) and the sector (emerging)
and leaves off the time frame (decade/s) .. most can recognize the tactic
bottom line is there will be some who for whatever reasons can't acknowledge
the impact the original NR entity that first *ran* PTOI had .. the handoff to the
other side of the original NR entity was an epic fail .. which is why they are all
(for the most part) still *there*
the reason for the penetration *here* by a handful is imo crystal clear .. it's all about control
the irony is only those who control any aspect is P2O's mgmt .. and their ability to execute on any level
when i look at 2 of my *alternative* energy *hedges* alongside P2O ..
i see one company finally (2 decades) hitting its stride .. i see another that was
so non retail friendly they R/S the stock .. multiple times just to *survive*
as i've always noted mgmt has options .. they almost never get discussed here
i just find it telling the longer P2O *lasts* the more the whining increases as if
anyone here (this SMB or there) has any impact on what P2O actually does
4kids
proclaim to have an interest in P2O
today one of my alternative energy company's (awareness of for years which
includes the recognition of the trading patterns in play by NR which *infect*
every US equity regardless of where traded .. which certainly wasn't *known*
10 years ago) .. after numerous R/S .. (to survive) that were re-shorted .. the company
had news some might consider it both *disruptive* and worth noting because of the impact
it *should* have on the company's PPS
but here is the thing .. the dolts (SEC) just acknowledged something recently that
some of us have wondered about for years .. how could the PPS gyrations on
targets have such a whipsaw UP only to be *re-shorted* right back down >> and that *volume*
and low and behold .. we now know why .. the SEC itself (EDGAR) was hacked
so back on 9.21.2017 this other alternative company *traded* up about 30c .. on volume that shouldn't
have passed anyone's smell test .. if they actually understood basics like *floats*
what those who had an interest learned .. was the hacking of Edgar allowed
those NR entities to *trade* off of news .. in advance of it being publicly filed and digested
our system is totally flawed and corrupt .. and NR utilized SMBs .. which most
with functioning gray matter recognize are sites for *opinions* .. when i see
a troll trot out posts from 2013/2014 .. most can recognize the tactic .. when a troll conflates
words very specific to the *technology* (disruptive) and the sector (emerging)
and leaves off the time frame (decade/s) .. most can recognize the tactic
bottom line is there will be some who for whatever reasons can't acknowledge
the impact the original NR entity that first *ran* PTOI had .. the handoff to the
other side of the original NR entity was an epic fail .. which is why they are all
(for the most part) still *there*
the reason for the penetration *here* by a handful is imo crystal clear .. it's all about control
the irony is only those who control any aspect is P2O's mgmt .. and their ability to execute on any level
when i look at 2 of my *alternative* energy *hedges* alongside P2O ..
i see one company finally (2 decades) hitting its stride .. i see another that was
so non retail friendly they R/S the stock .. multiple times just to *survive*
as i've always noted mgmt has options .. they almost never get discussed here
i just find it telling the longer P2O *lasts* the more the whining increases as if
anyone here (this SMB or there) has any impact on what P2O actually does
4kids
(0)
(0)
