Consider that they just don't have any more information to relay at the present time.
They've stated that on a number of occasions and also that when they had information to relay they would.
Instead of accepting that response from the company, some feel it is necessary to try to badger the company into saying more, when either for business or legal reasons they cant or won't.
Some then accuse the the company of impropriety because they feel slighted.
The company has the right and obligation to control information about their business, not only to safeguard the business, but to protect shareholder value by preventing information from getting out prematurely or getting into the wrong hands.
There is a big difference between what you want the company to tell you and what the company has to tell you legally.
NTEK has told us much more than they have had to.
If the company was not concerned about what shareholder sentiment , they would only provide information they legally had to...nothing more.
Some are taking personal, emotional offense to communication decisions the management feels are being made in the best interests of the business, which intern is in the best interest of the shareholders, whether one can accept that reasoning or not.
There is nothing unusual about this behavior from a company. They will tell give us info when they have it.
If you think there is some impropriety or management is incompetent , sell your shares, get out of the stock and sleep better at night if it bothers you that much.
Much better alternative then fretting over things you have absolutely no control over anyway.
It's the ultimate power the shareholder has over the company.
Risk/Reward..it's either one or the other when you invest, as is taking personal responsibility for the result of your investment decision one way or the other.
GL
They've stated that on a number of occasions and also that when they had information to relay they would.
Instead of accepting that response from the company, some feel it is necessary to try to badger the company into saying more, when either for business or legal reasons they cant or won't.
Some then accuse the the company of impropriety because they feel slighted.
The company has the right and obligation to control information about their business, not only to safeguard the business, but to protect shareholder value by preventing information from getting out prematurely or getting into the wrong hands.
There is a big difference between what you want the company to tell you and what the company has to tell you legally.
NTEK has told us much more than they have had to.
If the company was not concerned about what shareholder sentiment , they would only provide information they legally had to...nothing more.
Some are taking personal, emotional offense to communication decisions the management feels are being made in the best interests of the business, which intern is in the best interest of the shareholders, whether one can accept that reasoning or not.
There is nothing unusual about this behavior from a company. They will tell give us info when they have it.
If you think there is some impropriety or management is incompetent , sell your shares, get out of the stock and sleep better at night if it bothers you that much.
Much better alternative then fretting over things you have absolutely no control over anyway.
It's the ultimate power the shareholder has over the company.
Risk/Reward..it's either one or the other when you invest, as is taking personal responsibility for the result of your investment decision one way or the other.
GL
12
2
