(Total Views: 306)
Posted On: 09/25/2017 8:51:21 AM
Post# of 82676
The judge and the IPR review should factor in the infringing ramifications on sales. To not dismiss the IPR may cause a financial undue burden on SFOR and provide an unfair competitive advantage to the infringers growing sales of the products in question. I say just stop the madness and dismiss the IPR. Duo is not going to be able to deny it when the dockets already have pointed all the facts out.
20. Duo has also used its position in the out-of-band authentication market to attempt to force StrikeForce out of the marketplace. StrikeForce has lost the following contracts for out- of-band authentication to Duo:
1. Toyota Corporation, ( world's eighth-largest company by revenue)
2. Boston University,
3. Facebook, ($445B)
4. Bechtel, ($35B)
5. eBay, ($39B)
6. Google, ($692B)
7. Intel Corporation, ($172B)
8. Pennsylvania State University, and
9. Thycotic
21. Bechtel, Toyota Corporation, eBay, Google and Intel are examples of customers that chose between only Duo and StrikeForce for out-of-band authentication services. All chose
Duo over StrikeForce.
20. Duo has also used its position in the out-of-band authentication market to attempt to force StrikeForce out of the marketplace. StrikeForce has lost the following contracts for out- of-band authentication to Duo:
1. Toyota Corporation, ( world's eighth-largest company by revenue)
2. Boston University,
3. Facebook, ($445B)
4. Bechtel, ($35B)
5. eBay, ($39B)
6. Google, ($692B)
7. Intel Corporation, ($172B)
8. Pennsylvania State University, and
9. Thycotic
21. Bechtel, Toyota Corporation, eBay, Google and Intel are examples of customers that chose between only Duo and StrikeForce for out-of-band authentication services. All chose
Duo over StrikeForce.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
