(Total Views: 300)
Posted On: 09/15/2017 9:13:23 AM
Post# of 72447
I reworded...
BooDog Friday, 09/15/17 09:10:48 AM
Re: scottsmith post# 196931
Post # of 196966
It is more of an incomplete thought. IMO Leo shouldn't have written what he did at all. It's more like fake news and it's very misleading. Certainly shouldn't be a sticky post. I'm not saying it's not legit, but clearly incomplete. To me it sounds like the Prurisol trial is going well and they don't want to compromise it by releasing too much data. Doesn't say we won't see any data. And until we see a press release about the issue, IT IS A NON ISSUE. IMO
If it's really that complicated they should take the time to figure out what they're going to do and let everyone know.
BooDog Friday, 09/15/17 09:10:48 AM
Re: scottsmith post# 196931
Post # of 196966
It is more of an incomplete thought. IMO Leo shouldn't have written what he did at all. It's more like fake news and it's very misleading. Certainly shouldn't be a sticky post. I'm not saying it's not legit, but clearly incomplete. To me it sounds like the Prurisol trial is going well and they don't want to compromise it by releasing too much data. Doesn't say we won't see any data. And until we see a press release about the issue, IT IS A NON ISSUE. IMO
Quote:
Quote:
From Leo:
Our plan was to to do an interim analysis of patients who completed week 6 and look for a signal. Recruitment into the study was slower than anticipated. At this time, as most patients have completed the study, a look could create investigator bias. It will likely effect the Alpha and require more patients to be added to the study.
I do appreciate your suggestions but it is very complicated.
If it's really that complicated they should take the time to figure out what they're going to do and let everyone know.
(1)
(0)
