(Total Views: 218)
Posted On: 08/23/2017 10:34:37 AM
Post# of 43066
being the mod i get to read it all ..
but i understand why others would utilize
the ignore feature provided by this SMB
which is unlimited .. i also find it beyond telling
the migration from *there* to here .. as if noise
previously noted 100s of times .. will change
anyone's mind at this point in time .. highly doubtful
this dance has been done for years ..
i find it odd that some believe the relentless
compression of PTOI's pps would have no effect
on mgmt's ability to execute .. or that seamless
comes hand in glove with with the selling of a
disruptive tech .. there is no doubt many of us would
handle things differently with hindsight .. and i truly do
empathize with those actual investors who've indicated
they wish P2O hadn't been wrested back in mid August 2013
4.5 years of relentless PPS compression is exhausting .. no one will argue it isn't
but YOY *volume* would increase .. not decrease .. with legit selling
as all can see via other OTC stox utilized as both targets and cycles of money
this last round *here* re: PTOI .. is gonna get interesting .. because P2O
does have options and mgmt can execute aspects .. if so inclined ..
totally unrelated to MOU version 2 re: RC .. who has previously .. while current CEO *hasn't*
P2O still survives .. in spite of all the aggregate efforts in play since 2009
4kids
but i understand why others would utilize
the ignore feature provided by this SMB
which is unlimited .. i also find it beyond telling
the migration from *there* to here .. as if noise
previously noted 100s of times .. will change
anyone's mind at this point in time .. highly doubtful
this dance has been done for years ..
i find it odd that some believe the relentless
compression of PTOI's pps would have no effect
on mgmt's ability to execute .. or that seamless
comes hand in glove with with the selling of a
disruptive tech .. there is no doubt many of us would
handle things differently with hindsight .. and i truly do
empathize with those actual investors who've indicated
they wish P2O hadn't been wrested back in mid August 2013
4.5 years of relentless PPS compression is exhausting .. no one will argue it isn't
but YOY *volume* would increase .. not decrease .. with legit selling
as all can see via other OTC stox utilized as both targets and cycles of money
this last round *here* re: PTOI .. is gonna get interesting .. because P2O
does have options and mgmt can execute aspects .. if so inclined ..
totally unrelated to MOU version 2 re: RC .. who has previously .. while current CEO *hasn't*
P2O still survives .. in spite of all the aggregate efforts in play since 2009
4kids
Quote:
Just one more reason for iggy.
(1)
(0)
