Buh bye, 8th. Your 'food for thought' was lacking in nourishment.

Thanks for the armchair psyche evaluation. However I believe it applies even more to those who cling to conspiracy theories in the face of verifiable evidence that demolishes them, decisively.

I challenged your conspiracy theories with fact based responses.
I never saw a reply that addressed any of the rebuttals.

Sorry being challenged flummoxes you enough to abandon the board

Thank you also for my 'clearer perception and livelier impression of truth'.

Fortunately there's no increase in my 'collision rates', or deductibles, for the collisions of your errors with my truths/facts/evidence!

Hell, the impacts weren't even enough to deploy the air bags. LOL!

You may have missed Mill in college. The entire context for the quote below may be found here:

http://www.theopensociety.net/2014/11/the-col...ith-error/

Quote:

---

The collision of truth with error

If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. 

---