(Total Views: 274)
Posted On: 08/10/2017 12:27:45 PM
Post# of 43065
Re: Commando911 #36483
not being mgmt i can only give you the same response i gave you previously when this dance was last undertaken
the obvious answer is there is no *sales* team .. either external or internal re: P2O .. beyond mgmt
as i noted *previously* .. some could argue that Eco wasn't given enough time
but those posts were few against those who wanted *instant*
selling the first sale of a multi million $ disruptive tech is complex and incredibly time consuming
and that is with everything being *seamless* .. that isn't P2O which as we both
know has been a *target* since 2009
.. so the
approach i would have taken .. going the route of those *campuses*
with sustainable protocols in their corporate governance and cash to dedicate
to say nothing of the room to implement .. clearly isn't on the table ..
but that doesn't matter if RC .. who has installed a multi million $ site previously
can re-do that effort .. reading between the lines of MOU .. round 1 vs round 2
i'd say the site expected in round 1 has changed .. so the ? to be asked is
is this new site's infrastructure in place or being started from the ground up
and if so .. what is a realistic time frame for RC's investors to give because
if there is no infrastructure .. just raw land .. imo time line ramps to say nothing
of permitting .. and since i've PM'd you this multiple times .. it's not NYSDEC
permits that i'm referencing .. it's state and local for implementing this tech
remember the state of Indiana's time line .. 2018 - 2020 .. on *news* from the fall of 2016
again what i've stressed is *communication* out of RH that articulates on a layman's level
imo consistent communication is key for many (clearly not all)
4kids
the obvious answer is there is no *sales* team .. either external or internal re: P2O .. beyond mgmt
as i noted *previously* .. some could argue that Eco wasn't given enough time
but those posts were few against those who wanted *instant*
selling the first sale of a multi million $ disruptive tech is complex and incredibly time consuming
and that is with everything being *seamless* .. that isn't P2O which as we both
know has been a *target* since 2009
.. so the
approach i would have taken .. going the route of those *campuses*
with sustainable protocols in their corporate governance and cash to dedicate
to say nothing of the room to implement .. clearly isn't on the table ..
but that doesn't matter if RC .. who has installed a multi million $ site previously
can re-do that effort .. reading between the lines of MOU .. round 1 vs round 2
i'd say the site expected in round 1 has changed .. so the ? to be asked is
is this new site's infrastructure in place or being started from the ground up
and if so .. what is a realistic time frame for RC's investors to give because
if there is no infrastructure .. just raw land .. imo time line ramps to say nothing
of permitting .. and since i've PM'd you this multiple times .. it's not NYSDEC
permits that i'm referencing .. it's state and local for implementing this tech
remember the state of Indiana's time line .. 2018 - 2020 .. on *news* from the fall of 2016
again what i've stressed is *communication* out of RH that articulates on a layman's level
imo consistent communication is key for many (clearly not all)
4kids
Quote:
so why is making a sale so monumentally difficult?
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
