J&J through their Summary Judgment filing is attempting to show one thing. That is, that DECN's Doctrine of Equivalents based lawsuit doesn't apply in this case and the judge should throw it out based on that single fact. Everything else in the pleading is just the usual J&J nonsense where they paint a picture of DECN being unworthy as a competitor because they have a financial statement that J&J adjudges to be inferior, Shasta playing fast and loose with FDA QA regulations and getting caught -- in 2013, DECN's expert being a dope, and communications between the lawyers where J&J is trying to show that DECN's lawyers somehow agree with them.

Pathetic. In fact J&J's entire filing reads like an iHub message board post, except it is a lot longer.