(Total Views: 207)
Posted On: 07/25/2017 8:01:46 AM
Post# of 72440
Just stating facts, not innuendo. Your very FIRST post about CTIX was your typical Finra numbers post with CTIX being 60% short that day. Not one good word to say about the company. CTIX was $3.55 that day. Question, why would you invest in a $ 3.55 stock that was being illegally shorted at 60%. Especially when you know those shorting never have to cover. You stated you only post FINRA numbers in companies you are invested.
Fact, MAKO immediately shows up within days of your post with their first hit piece on CTIX. Two years later your still posting daily fake short numbers and MAKO is still producing fake hit pieces on the company.
Coincidence or not, it is still a fact. It also could be incredibly bad timing on your part.
Hopefully IPIX gets the financial security to end the bullsh!t and you can move on and scare the investors at another company with your short numbers.
IPIX 2017
Fact, MAKO immediately shows up within days of your post with their first hit piece on CTIX. Two years later your still posting daily fake short numbers and MAKO is still producing fake hit pieces on the company.
Coincidence or not, it is still a fact. It also could be incredibly bad timing on your part.
Hopefully IPIX gets the financial security to end the bullsh!t and you can move on and scare the investors at another company with your short numbers.
IPIX 2017
(4)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
