(Total Views: 330)
Posted On: 07/23/2017 5:36:27 PM
Post# of 15187
"There were no short positions in hjoe ever. Never were any naked shorts ever. Any short interest, in the 10's of hundreds, meaning less than a 1000 shares at any one time were covered in the legal 2/3 day time period. "
What is so hilarious about that post, is how quickly he contradicts himself. First sentence He claims there were never any short positions on hjoe ever, and then two sentences later he says there were 10's of hundreds. He can't keeps his lies straight even in the very same post.
I know when I was trying to purchase some of the stock for both my daughter's, using the broker account their money was in, the broker would not allow the purchase to go through due to the high amount of shorting taking place.
What is so hilarious about that post, is how quickly he contradicts himself. First sentence He claims there were never any short positions on hjoe ever, and then two sentences later he says there were 10's of hundreds. He can't keeps his lies straight even in the very same post.
I know when I was trying to purchase some of the stock for both my daughter's, using the broker account their money was in, the broker would not allow the purchase to go through due to the high amount of shorting taking place.
(5)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
