Kelt, I've been refuting bashers for six years and I don't think I ever gave validity to their FUDs. Before the name/CUSIP change, I was skeptical of Alan's theory but I didn't have proof. After CTIX became IPIX, I have the proof I was looking for.

IMHO my intention is good for the stock. I want more readers to invest so I put together DDs in the sticky section to help them. Unless someone can give me a logical explanation that "50% of today's volume were short sales" attracts new investors, I'll continue to help new investors decide what's right and what's wrong by voicing my opinion.